2024 Author: Steven Freeman | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-17 08:15
It is quite possible that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle never imagined the barrage of fierce criticism that was going to rain down on them in the wake of their latest statement abiding by Queen Elizabeth II's ban on using their brand, Sussex-Royal, but making it clear that they were not according to her powerful grandmother.
Despite the fact that the old sovereign is extremely discreet and tries to constantly show the public a tone of unity within the royal family, the reality is that this rebellious couple does not leave much to the imagination with their interviews and communications.
For this reason, it is not only the most sensationalist media in the United Kingdom that foam at the mouth when talking about them, now it is also the most staunch fans of the monarchy who are baiting with the latest news from Meghan and Harry.
This same week, Tom Bower, biographer of Prince Charles, very famous among royalty, defined the Duchess of Sussex in full televised interview as "rude and vindictive".
The famous writer assured, with no hair on his tongue, that in the communiqué of the Dukes of Sussex the fury of Harry's wife could be read between the lines: "What Meghan wants, Meghan achieves", he asserted, calling it capricious, and assuring that the statement was a veritable rudeness to the queen.
Do anything Meghan married a member of the royal family and then took off. But she also wants to do it under her own demands. What matters to us in this country is protecting the reputation of our royal family. And what you find is this couple, led by Meghan, who wants to take commercial advantage of belonging to that family ”, the writer continued spilling the soup.
When asked by the host of the show in question, Susanna Reid of Good Morning, Britain, about the reliability of her sources, to be able to say coldly and openly that it was Meghan who was directing Harry, Bower replied: “It's the truth. ! She has spent her entire career commercially exploiting her life. And she has no status beyond that of being married to a member of the royal family.”
Journalist Piers Morgan had already reacted this way to the latest statement from Meghan and Harry: “Who the hell do they think they are? They show amazing disrespect. " Another royal expert, Richard Fitzwilliams, also stressed that the latest comments from the Dukes of Sussex were out of place, as "they highlight their differences with Buckingham in an absolutely unnecessary way."
Although the driver finally reminded Tom Bower that Meghan already had a successful life before Harry, that was no restraint for Queen Elizabeth's outraged writer and faithful subject: “ If she had not married Prince Harry, she would never I could not have put together such a charitable organization, nor would I have accomplished everything else. They are trying to get money at the expense of the royal family, he insisted.
Recommended:
Epidemic And Pandemic: The Difference According To The WHO
The World Health Organization (WHO) has officially declared that the coronavirus epidemic has already become a pendemic. Here we explain the difference
Meghan And Harry: Goodbye Royalty, Hello Nature And Yoga
The Dukes of Sussex have yoga and nature as their favorite pastime in Canada
Pros And Cons Of Being Royalty, According To Meghan And Harry
The Dukes of Sussex expressed themselves many times about the inconveniences of being part of the British royal family
Gigi And Bella Hadid Carry Books As Accessories According To New York Post
Hundreds of users are defending girls and their interest in reading
The Compatibility Of Meghan Markle And Her Baby According To The Zodiac
The Duchess of Sussex is Leo, and her little son is expected to be born under the influence of Taurus. How compatible will they be? Walter Mercado reveals it